Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hassall (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 00:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

John Hassall (musician)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Possibly notable band member. BLP article lacking sources since October 2006. Mr.  Z- man  04:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 23:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Comment Bad article, but he looks like a keep to me. Certainly more likely than most band dweebs that show up here. The Libertines gets him in. MarkBul 02:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Keep Former member of a notable band. Sure, it's a poor article, but that is certainly no reason to delete it. I'll try to do some work on it. faithless   (speak)  06:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've cleaned up the article a bit and included some citations. faithless   (speak)  07:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The guy looks okay by me. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 06:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, notability established and decent sources added - good job faithless ;) EyeSerene TALK 19:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks EyeSerene. :) faithless   (speak)  15:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Can't abide any of the bands he's been and the article's fancruft, in but he definitely passes WP:NN. Needs a real cleanup. Pete Fenelon 01:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.