Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hattie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  13:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

John Hattie

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While Hattie's commentary is often sought in news articles, there is little to no significant coverage of Hattie himself in reliable sources. Current content is predominantly unsourced. Adabow (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Education,  and New Zealand. Adabow (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep but it needs a rewrite to include notability criteria and relevant references to quotes in the media. This individual meets criteria 7 of WP:Notability(Academics) as he is regularly quoted in the media. After a quick google news search I found him in the Times Gazette, Sydney Morning Herald, the Daily Star, ABC magazine, or the Canberra Times. JamesKH76 (talk) 08:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep his book Visible learning has 21000 citations according to Google Scholar, his article The power of feedback 15000 citations. H@r@ld (talk) 06:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets notability criteria as an academic. AfD is not clean up.  Schwede 66  16:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets notability criteria as an Academics. There is lots of information out there, it just requires someone to add it and reference it properly. I do note there is an article on his Visible learning, though the talk page didn't think they should be merged, I'm inclined to think they could be. Otherwise it does provide more references also.— NZFC  (talk) (cont)  03:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.