Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Henry Silva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 07:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

John Henry Silva

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable person. Power~enwiki (talk) 07:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete despite all the sources, it seems that he fails WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Please elaborate what your reasoning is. Boston499344 (talk)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:06, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Notable person under private equity and veterans. Sky4988 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't find much in a before. Sourcing here is mainly low quality or random quotes.Icewhiz (talk) 05:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.