Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hulme (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WPSNOW  MBisanz  talk 05:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

John Hulme (author)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnotable person. Fails WP:N and WP:CREATIVE. Only a few minor creative efforts: one minor book series, unnotable anthology, unnotable radio series, and an unnotable documentary. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 04:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources have been added. Artw (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  09:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The New York Times and HBO find him notable enough to have covered him. Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep as above  Chzz  ►  15:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, seems notable enough. Stifle (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  21:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:RS. Pastor Theo (talk) 03:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep But it is a shame that the article is not expanded. I do not know on what basis the nominator considers the book series minor, since it has reviews in multiple major news sources.   DGG (talk) 19:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.