Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John J. "Bald Jack" Ryan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 14:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

John J. "Bald Jack" Ryan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

If this does not meet WP:TNT I don't know what does. Laun chba  ller  20:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:TNT is only an essay. Do you have any policy-based arguments for deletion? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The article is already sourced. I added a source from WP:Newspapers.com. There are many many more sources via Newspaper.com. I am One of Many (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (chinwag)  @ 10:20, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - reliable refs. No need for deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep while whether some of the listed (print) sources amount to WP:SIGCOV is questionable, their breadth seems to indicate that this meets the bar on notability... Roberticus  talk  19:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.