Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John J. Flood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The SandDoctor Talk 05:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

John J. Flood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP with no verifiable references from reliable sources. All refs appear to be self-published (the subject runs ipsn.org). User:JJFCCPA appears to be the subject. See also the deleted history of John J Flood. PRODded, deleted, contested, and restored. — Jeff G. ツ 01:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination; non-notable. WhinyTheYounger (talk) 02:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Devokewater @  10:38, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Seems like a vanity page and nothing more. Ə XPLICIT 00:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the very tone is unencyclopedic in a way that usually indicates the article was drawn and sourced from promotional materials of the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. It may be 100% true, but if he's not covered significantly in reliable sources, he's not notable as we define it. Zero news articles on Google, passing mentions in a book, few citations to his work (if it's the same person). Bearian (talk) 20:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: see also this edit.  — Jeff G. ツ 04:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , you may like to use Special:Permalink/969628247 instead; the link above has been broken ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:41, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.