Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Johannes Kites


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 20:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

John Johannes Kites

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * I am also nominating the following related article, on another fictitious character from the same book, for the same reason. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:42, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I would like to add the following related article: apparently an alternate name for this fictional character. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I would like to add the following related article: apparently an alternate name for this fictional character. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I would like to add the following related article: apparently an alternate name for this fictional character. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Non-notable character from a non-notable unpublished book by a non-notable author. No sources, at least not secondary ones. —C.Fred (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I endorse the addition of the two related articles to this AfD. They appear to be similar in topic and suffering from similar problems. —C.Fred (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: No reliable sources (are reliable sources possible in this case?), fan-ish, with a hint of advertising. הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 22:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Expanding my !vote to include the other articles as well. הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 18:24, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yikes. This article is a huge mess. Not only was I unable to find any sources about the character, but the book the character is from isn't even out. If it ever will be, which is probably doubtful at this point in time.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   23:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication of notability, arguably violates WP:CRYSTAL too. GregorB (talk) 23:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Applicable also to the two subsequently listed articles, of course. GregorB (talk) 09:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 01:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 01:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. A character from an unpublished book, neither of which are the subject of any reliable, independent coverage. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable characters from non-notable unpublished book. What more needs to be said? JamesBWatson (talk) 13:36, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete All three articles should be deleted as the madeup characters of a non-notable fictional universe. It is not clear that any books featuring these characters have ever yet been published.  It appears more that the authors of these potential books are using Wikipedia as a medium to develop their characters and plotlines.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources, no hope - QuiteUnusual TalkQu 17:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, I had speedied Alexandria Caedere as a hoax, but the nominator disagrees. Regardless, there's clearly a bunch of nonsense in both articles, so they should be removed post-haste. WP:SNOWBALL, in my opinion.   PK  T (alk)  20:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think that the articles probably are hoaxes, but they are not such blatantly obvious hoaxes that I see them as qualifying for speedy deletion. However, I think this kind of stuff really should be speedily deletable. A group of friends, or perhaps one person using several names, writes a load of stuff about a supposed book which has never been published, and for all we know doesn't even exist in manuscript. It is a waste of everybody's time to have to debate this for a week, so if any admin who has not contributed to this discussion would like to perform a SNOW delete, that will be the best outcome. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, Non-notable characters from a non-notable unpublished book by a non-notable author is a good definition for these. Cavarrone (talk) 09:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Solid nomination. The obscurity of this character ultimately results very little third party publications. Mkdw talk 04:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:SNOW --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.