Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Jovino Gun Shop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

John Jovino Gun Shop
The result was keep. R udget zŋ 18:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Very few sources to be found, notability claimed by being "seen" in two separate films. Claim as "oldest gun shop in the USA" seems to be unfounded after search. Jmlk 1  7  06:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No references found in third-party sources; Google search primarily turns up listings, passing references, and a couple of blogs talking about how how cool the sign is. As for the claim to fame, I believe those sightings should go on the more notable articles about the movies it was seen in. --jonny-mt(t)(c) Tell me what you think! 06:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Remind me to always always always search Google News in the future. Keep per Masaruemoto. --jonny-mt(t)(c) Tell me what you think! 06:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep; I found a New York Times article and a Village Voice article, both reasonably significant coverage about John Jovino. Both of those articles showed up in the first 5 Google results. Masaruemoto 06:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a notable rarity in NYC. -- Dougie WII 06:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yo KEEP dis artikel man t3xt 07:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC) I Created the motherfucker, and it IS a notable rarity in the fucking CITY OF NEW YORK. Guns? GUNS? GUNS? GUNS? I MEAN PEOPLE VIEW AMERICA AS ONE BIG HOLSTER. Per What Wikipedia is not, of course. Entirely factual. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Victorgrigas (talk • contribs)
 * Comment Please sign your comments at the end using four tildes, and please try to write in civil English. In AFD discussion, please try to make a point that is supported in policies and guidelines. --Dhartung | Talk 09:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep but source and cleanup. The editor(s) may wish to read our manual of style. But it seems to be notable. (There are some more results under "Jovino Company", the official name.) --Dhartung | Talk 09:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Just needs work. Colonel Warden 10:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.