Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Lammers (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. Hut 8.5 16:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

John Lammers (footballer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

"Possible Copyright Infringement Notice" has remained in place since 23 September 2010. Unless someone is willing to remove the notice and take responsibility for any copyright violations, the article should be deleted. Dolovis (talk) 16:22, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep in this case the fact that the article is an unreviewed potential copyvio isn't a reason for deletion. The article was only blanked because it was created by User:Darius Dhlomo, who was discovered to have created a lot of articles wtih copyright violations (see Contributor copyright investigations/Darius Dhlomo). It's not one of the normal copyvio notices associated with WP:CV. I have checked the content of the article and I have concluded that Darius Dhlomo wrote it by summarising statistics and it isn't a copyright violation. Hut 8.5 17:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. He played lots in the top Dutch league. No brainer. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash;innotata 21:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash;innotata 21:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. J Mo 101 (talk) 14:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly notable, lazy nomination. GiantSnowman 14:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination: I searched but was unable to determine if there was a copyright violation due to the numerous wiki-mirror sites. The issue was copyright infringement, not notability. Copyvio tag has now been removed. This tag should have been removed by the editor who contested the PROD, but he left it in place forcing me to open this AfD to discuss the claimed copyright violation. Dolovis (talk) 15:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.