Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Leszak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 15:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

John Leszak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, Under name search, GNews has only one entry, which is self-labelled as "local." No significant hits in GBooks or GHits. Under search of "Stamps Magazine" & "Leszak", no in-depth coverage, mere slight mentions of the magazine and him as editor. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. GregJackP  Boomer!   18:48, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR. Qworty (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 07:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Sources found Leszak is a stamp dealer from Buffalo. He was the co-chairman of the 2000 National Topical Stamp Show. He has written many articles published in the periodical Stamps (ISSN: 0038-9358) published by American Publishing Company. This appears to be a major periodical as it was up to volume 255 in 1996, beyond that I can't tell. I can't tell if this is the same magazine the article claims he was editor of. If so it might be notable but the sources are slim. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: It appears the subject has written plenty of articles, but I can't find a single reliable, independent source about the man himself. Thus this fails the WP:GNG criteria for lack of significant coverage. --Batard0 (talk) 12:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.