Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John M. Anastasatos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

John M. Anastasatos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is basically a professional-directory listing/clip file for a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon. Yeah, he gets himself booked on TV shows, but I'm not seeing actual notability here. Calton | Talk 06:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 09:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 09:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Delete An ordinary (promotional) CV of a medical practitioner in the highly competitive field of cosmetic surgery (facial rejuvenation, breast enhancement, vaginal beautification, body contouring ). ——Chalk19 (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Comment John M. Anastasatos is a known plastic surgeon in Beverly Hills and in Greece as well, with many honors and recognitions during his scientific career WP:NACADEMIC, a lot of scientific presentations and publications. “Search engine statistics” is not a requirement to decide if an article should be deleted or not WP:INVALIDBIO.

Below there are the General notability guideline. I believe that this article passes all of them, and as such, should not be deleted. WP:GNG

• "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent. (Article does not fail this.)

• "Sources", should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. Sources do not have to be available online or written in English. (Article does not fail this either.)

• "Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability. (Plenty of reliable sources have been provided in this article, i.e. https://www.forbes.com/search/?q=Anastasatos#40bd379e279f)

• "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material (This has been provided as well.)

In my opinion this article has no promotional style and does not fail to the Writing style a Biography of a living person must have WP:BLPSTYLE. However I made some improvements. GogouAnastasia (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment The user above has contributions only on John M. Anastasatos. Maybe there is a WP:COI with her subject. ——Chalk19 (talk) 07:015, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete an overly promotional article on a medical doctor in an overly promotional field.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete- article looks like linkedin. As other have said above, the doctor is not notable. I do not see him passing WP:NACADEMIC, he may be a good doctor, buts its not like he invented plastic surgery.--Rusf10 (talk) 23:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.