Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John M. Keller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

John M. Keller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This individual does not appear to meet academic notability guidelines. (If this article can be improved within seven days, it may meet notability.) Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Is this nomination a hoax? 19 publications with over 100 cites each romps through WP:Prof. Nominator deserves a mighty WP:Trout. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC).
 * Weak Delete: article as it exists is a resume/CV. Suggest those who want to keep get started on improving it. Quis separabit?  15:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)  Change vote to Keep upon re-examination.  Quis separabit?  13:53, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm as confused as . According to Google Scholar he is extremely widely cited, showing a clear pass of WP:PROF. The resumeness or otherwise of the article is irrelevant; deletion is not cleanup. And what's happening in seven days? Joe Roe (talk) 16:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The brevity of the BLP is a virtue: better than endless paragraphs of promotional bloat that one finds in some. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC).


 * Keep per WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.