Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Magno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   retitle with redirects. Not a conventional close, but it seems here that something happened, and has enough sources to be in wikipedia. The two BIO articles, by consensus, should be merged together under a new title, as suggested first by User:GoldDragon. Keeper &#448;  76  17:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

John Magno

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Two WP:ONEVENT biographies for alleged co-conspirators in a fatal arson in Toronto, Ontario. One is convicted, the other is awaiting trial. This is a tragic but non-notable crime. • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I suggest merging both into one article. The new title could be Woodbine Building Supply Fire. GoldDragon (talk) 16:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Gene93k, and move relevant content from both articles into one about the event, as suggested by GoldDragon. JNW (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If we do that, we'll need to keep these titles as redirects to the new article rather than deleting them per se. Bearcat (talk) 14:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I can go along with the merge to new article about the event as suggested by GoldDragon. The new article would, however, need to maintain the author history of the two articles for GFDL purposes so I suggest that changing them into redirects would be easy, cheap, and possibly useful. Double Blue  (Talk) 02:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 10:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Borderline merge into an article on the event. I'd say the event itself is borderline notable, so wouldn't be hugely opposed to deletion, but I don't see much wrong with keeping it either, since it can be reasonably well referenced. The people by themselves only seem notable for their connection with this one event, so should redirect. --Delirium (talk) 04:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * An article about the event might be valid. I strongly suspect it's of much too local interest to really pass muster, but I'm willing to withhold judgement until I see what kind of effort, if any, somebody is or isn't prepared to put into it. As WP:BLP1E topics with very little notability otherwise, Magno and Roks should exist only as redirects to such an article if one exists, and not at all if one doesn't. Merge into an article about the event if someone's willing and able to write one that passes WP:N, but delete if that can't or doesn't happen. Bearcat (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.