Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Maxwell Hobbs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (should have been deleted as non-notable bio but for the original author's vandalistic actions). --Nlu 01:00, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

John Maxwell Hobbs
When newly created, was a CV/vanity page. I speedied it but the speedy was removed by the original author, so I am AfDing it. The article reads a bit better now though -- SGBailey 23:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Abstain, I don't know enough about this to vote meaningfully. However the fact that the author removed the speedy without due process weighs slightly in favour of delete IMO. -- SGBailey 23:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Here's his website award . FRS 03:53, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, but note that the page author has only edited this page and one other and has a use name starting jmax wghich seems close to john maxwell, and the original text for this page has now parked itself on his user page - so I conclude it is a self-edit. The award appears genuine - is it notable? -- SGBailey 09:17, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

RELISTED NOVEMBER 28, 2005, PLEASE ADD NEW VOTES BELOW THIS NOTICE' Jtkiefer T  00:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

comment relisted due to having no votes at time of close. Jtkiefer T 00:41, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.