Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McFarland (ice hockey) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

John McFarland (ice hockey)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Junior player who has yet to play professionally or meet any of the conditions of WP:NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if the subject achieves notability. Previous AfD was closed as “No-consensus”, and the newly modified WP:NHOCKEY makes his claim for notability even weaker now then it was then. Poinkie (talk) 20:21, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 00:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. Fails WP:NHOCKEY, as nom notes. Fails WP:GNG, with mostly mostly WP:ROUTINE mentions and player directory entries. I think pieces such as this and this are too small-potatoes to make the case for notability, but I certainly think there is a chance that he could pass WP:NHOCKEY in the future. If and when he does, let's have this article back. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 12:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No pro experience, no appearances with the senior national time, insufficient coverage to meet GNG, awards won are minor and do not confer notability. Ravendrop 00:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.