Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mike Dooley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

John Mike Dooley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable individual, no reliable secondary sources about the individual, does not meet WP:ATHLETE exception to WP:N. 2008 Olym pian chit chat 19:25, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Appears to be notable within the sport. An unsourced article is no reason to delete. It appears the nominator has been nominating several similar articles Jenuk1985  |  Talk  19:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I ask that this nom be withdrawn and the article be tagged with or  as appropriate instead. I can find no reason in WP:DEL for this page to be nominated.  Jenuk1985  |  Talk  20:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jenuk, but because of BLP requirements, it needs to be rewritten with some sources very soon. And could all these hurling AfDs not have been grouped?! ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 20:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article definitely needs some references, but independent of this the subject does meet WP:N.  Flying  Toaster  21:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep As per WP:GAA guidelines ,WP:ATH and the above Gnevin (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies WP:ATH. Rosiestep (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.