Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John O. Henes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America1000 05:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

John O. Henes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC. Little depth of coverage. Fails WP:ANYBIO. He was locally a wealthy person, and donated 50 acres of land on which a park named after him is located. This doesn't seem to pass the ANYBIO criteria of "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". He appears to be a successful local businessman, but not notable by Wikipedia standards. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator. Sufficient new information has been added to the article.  Magnolia677 (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article has been expanded to included Henes' inventing activity. Doremo (talk) 12:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 16:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 16:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 16:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 16:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep -- the inventing activity adds to notability. Not sure by how much, but I believe the article adds value to the encyclopedia at this point. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:26, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep and I nearly closed myself, there's enough for a historically-informative article; this is similar to an article I improved some time ago. SwisterTwister   talk  06:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.