Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Oliver Black


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Three weeks is ample time to make a case for keeping and no one has done so. Jenks24 (talk) 10:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

John Oliver Black

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. Tagged as possibly non-notable since August 2015. Even if notable would still require a fundamental rewrite to meet wiki standards. FuriouslySerene (talk) 23:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 23:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * How long will this discussion be open? Time enough for all editors to see? Also, I need to study how to prove he is notable and then provide proof. Red Rose 13 (talk) 11:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Generally for at least a week. You can demonstrate notability, and therefore deserves his own article, by showing he's received significant coverage in reliable sources. See WP:N and WP:BIO for more details on what would qualify. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now and draft and userfy if actually needed as there's hardly much to suggest solid notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.