Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Osborne (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure.  Jujutacular  T · C 19:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

John Osborne (writer)

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Non-notable author, per WP:CREATIVE. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 11:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added sources that demonstrate that the subject passes WP:CREATIVE criteria 3 and 4(c). Phil Bridger (talk) 10:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but clean up - I can see that he meets notability. but the peacock language must be remove. Bearian (talk) 18:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I've started the project, but it's still a mess. Bearian (talk) 18:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep I agree with Bearian, needs some cleanup but notability is firmly established DRosin (talk) 12:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The notability question has been resolved due to the list of sources added to the page that talk specifically about the subject. The article could use cleanup and expansion, but at present shows no problem signs as far as BLP goes. Mrathel (talk) 16:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.