Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Paulett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

John Paulett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. Only claims to significance are winning a few non-notable awards (Golden Apple Award has the most citations -- it's given to ten Chicago high school teachers every year), writing a non-notable book (two citations -- one is an article that talks about Paulett for just a sentence or two, the other is an incorrect link, but it seems to be referring to a blog's review that wouldn't really establish notability), and co-founding a questionably-notable art project space. Iago Qnsi (talk) 02:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable under WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. The reviews & other sources are not sufficiently substantial for the GNG.  DGG ( talk ) 07:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches found nothing convincingly better at all. SwisterTwister   talk  08:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. The book authorship looks a more likely avenue for notability than the redlinked teaching award, but one local review isn't enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete It's not quite enough to satisfy either Author or the GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.