Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Philip Newell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

John Philip Newell

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was dePRODed with a promise to find sources that never happened. All the sources for this article is either insufficient to prove notability or is connected to the subject CiphriusKane (talk) 20:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. CiphriusKane (talk) 20:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CiphriusKane (talk) 20:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CiphriusKane (talk) 20:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Not seeing a ton of reviews for WP:NAUTHOR on a cursory look but he has a Contemporary Authors bio here. They're not super selective so it wouldn't count towards WP:ANYBIO, but a start. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient notability as per WP:N GNG, especially references that are independent of the subject. Coldupnorth (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete doesn't demonstrate notability. User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 02:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not seeing enough significant independent coverage to support WP:BASIC or WP:NAUTHOR. There's some run of the mill praise quotes on his books but that's generally not independent. There's some blogs that review his works but they're generally not reliable. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.