Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Potestio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

John Potestio

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article without any references, no independent sources could be found. Does not meet notability criteria. Broc (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada. Broc (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Notability not found for WP:Prof. Will have to be found elsewhere. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC).
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I found four reviews of four books, one each:, , , . But the first three are all in the same journal and the last two are of edited works, so really for his authored works we have one review each of two books, both in the same journal. This falls a little short of WP:AUTHOR for me. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.