Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Riddell (news)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) &#xF0F6;  17:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

John Riddell (news)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local newsperson, admittedly of a sizable city, and although the name seems to be fairly common (so it's possible I'm overlooking something that indicates he's received something other than very local coverage, I'm... just not seeing much to indicate that he's received anything other than extremely local coverage. Crated by a fairly obvious COI account besides. Timothy Joseph Wood  19:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable to a scale beyond local level. Ajf773 (talk) 10:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- an unremarkable TV announcer. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, trivial. Kierzek (talk) 16:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.