Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Robert Porter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 18:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

John Robert Porter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of independent notability, fails WP:BIO and WP:NOTINHERITED applies. GSS (talk |c|em ) 14:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 14:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 14:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep -- This nomination makes no sense at all. There's plenty of evidence of notability.  And what is it supposed to be independent of according to nom?  Who knows.  It's another misuse of NOTINHERITED, which actually doesn't apply at all.  Take a look at these sources:
 * Porter's son in US loan row -- The Guardian
 * Publicity-shy Tesco son makes debut in latest internet launch -- Financial News
 * Add these to the sources already in the article and we have an easy pass of GNG. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per IP FOARP (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of sources and the man is a billionaire. It would be rare to find a billionaire who wasn't notable. There aren't that many of them. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. GooglerW (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.