Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Robinson (Canadian actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

John Robinson (Canadian actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced Ficaia (talk) 20:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ficaia (talk) 20:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Television,  and Canada.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Almost every mention of this actor on Google is a mirror of this article. I haven't been able to find anything in the way of independent references to him or his work. Unfortunately can't meet WP:GNG without good sources, and I don't see them. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The name is too common to find any sources, but I'd be willing to reconsider if we can dig some up. Oaktree b (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. As always, the notability test for actors is not just "a list of roles is present" — the article has to be supported by reliable sources that establish the significance of at least some of his performances, such as by verifying that he won or was nominated for major acting awards (Oscar, Emmy, Canadian Screen Award, etc.) or by analyzing the roles in enough depth to count toward WP:GNG (as opposed to just glancingly namechecking his existence in a cast list). His strongest potential notability claim is as the lead character in Zero Patience, but on checking ProQuest for that I don't find coverage about him, I just find coverage that mentions his name in the process of being about the film — and even if we accepted that anyway, NACTOR #1 still requires multiple significant roles, not just one. Bearcat (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.