Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Rochon, Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

John Rochon, Jr.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't indicate notability (or even significance really), doesn't have any references besides his bio on his company's website and external links about CVSL rather than Rochon himself  Iago Qnsi  (talk) 05:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Obvious delete, unref'd BLP. Person is way way below notability standards, zero usable refs. CEO of a company (Richmont Holdings) which does not itself have an article or probably deserve one. If Richmont Holdings gets an article, a sentence or two on this person could be added (if ref'd). CVSL has an article, but 1) he's just board member, and 2) it's described as "a community of multiple... companies, each maintaining its own unique brand, knit together in a publicly traded company as a network of networks" which is a barftastic way to describe a company (they probably have "mind-encounter sessions" instead of "meetings" I suppose) and tends to make my spam-O-meter go off. Herostratus (talk) 03:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.