Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Romaniello


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

John Romaniello

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly promotional article on borderline notable author, with an absurdly unreliable list of references. As I suspected, checking the actual NYTimes bestseller list shows it was on the subsidiary list for Advice and How-To: (Sunday, May 05th 2013), which does not show notability. . Borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an equally good reason. Accepting articles that are part of a promotional campaign causes great damage. Once we become a vehicle for advertising, we're useless as an encycopedia  DGG ( talk ) 01:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best as my searches simply found a few links which were expected and nothing of convincing improvements which can also be said for this article. The article is still questionable overall despite the number of sources. SwisterTwister   talk  01:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not meet WP:ANYBIO, a gsearch brings up nothing reliable for notability. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:58, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.