Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Shanahan

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete 4 / Keep 2: Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:12, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

John Shanahan
And another non-notable actor. -R. fiend 21:30, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Doesn't even have an IMDB article! Now, being listed on IMDB isn't a sign of note, but not being listed is a sign of complete obscurity even in the world of straight to video bargain bucket B-movies. Average Earthman 14:11, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP... I'm beginning to feel that you like reading yourself... Wow, the fiend hasn't put up John H. Tobin? Will wonders never cease! Plank 00:34, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the suggestion. -R. fiend 02:42, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Xezbeth  10:32, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn, etc. Ummm, I'm sensing a pattern here.  Edeans 06:22, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Let's include these things.Zantastik 07:49, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Are you really claiming that anything and everything that is factual should be in Wikipedia? Do you know Anthony di Pierro?  RickK 07:53, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Don't say that, Rick, you'll summon him.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 00:53, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * LOL! Delete for lack of content if not out-and-out questionable notability.  Thanks for the laugh, fellas. - Lucky 6.9 01:05, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)