Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Sorenson (recording engineer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

John Sorenson (recording engineer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be the same person as John A. Sorensen Rathfelder (talk) 21:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: Two instances of the same article, neither ideally named, with the earlier instance nominated here. I am going to redirect the 2016 copy to this article to simplify matters and preserve contribution history. AllyD (talk) 07:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I am literally finding nothing and none of this suggests an actually better article at all, there's certainly nothing here suggesting otherwise so that's not surprising there are no hopes of improvements, of course let alone substance. Naturally, there's no serious independent notability by simply having named people and groups listed. SwisterTwister   talk  02:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable recording engineer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:43, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete --an underdeveloped LinkedIn profile. Nothing notable about the subject, while it attempts to WP:INHERIT notability from more notable entities. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.