Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Stamatopoulos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

John Stamatopoulos

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Vanity article that totally fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG standards. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 13:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm amazed that it's survived 4 years without being A7 speedied. No evidence of notabillity, no citations other than a self written vanity piece. Delete--ThePaintedOne (talk) 15:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent sources are present to verify the article's contents and the subject's notability. Guoguo12  --Talk--  17:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Wave supplementation program" is the only actual claim to fame, and a search for this comes up blank other than links back to WP. --WTFITS (talk) 05:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. He may have built up his muscles, but he hasn't built up his notability.  Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.