Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Stevens Berry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Yunshui 雲 水 09:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

John Stevens Berry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page is well written. It makes several different claims at notability (author, entertainer, lawyer) all of which I ultimately feel come up short. The best sourcing I can find is coverage in local newspapers about clients he's represented but not about him more generally. The sourcing on this page is all basically autobiographical so that's no help either. Feels borderline. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - I don't care for this page as written and sourced, but looking at newspapers.com, there is more than enough material to create a better article than currently exists. I think the current article fails WP:NOR, and maybe WP:PROMO, but here are a few profiles of Berry that could be used . If someone wants to do this and doesn't have access to newspapers.com, let me know and I'll make clippings of the articles that are open access. If no one wants to take the project on, I do not have a strong opinion that it should definitely be kept. Smmurphy(Talk) 21:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Smmurphy(Talk) 21:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 30.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 06:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.