Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John T. Knight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

John T. Knight

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created by a banned user after the ban. Significant edits by other editors and existing talk page discussion mean that speedy-deletion should not be used. Taking to AFD rather than PROD to get a discussion-based outcome. On its merits: The person seems notable only for 1 event, an event which was an accident of history and which does not have its own article. See talk page for more discussion. Also, many things are unreferenced. My recommendation: If this person does meet WP:Notability then it's best to WP:STARTOVER. If he does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines then of course there should not be an article about him. Note: As the creator is banned, I did not leave any note on the creating-account's talk page. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  21:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Information [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_T._Knight&diff=&oldid=534917934 Diff] showing changes since initial edits by page creator. These edits are largely removing material and wiki-formatting/cleanup, not addition of new material.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  21:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a case of WP:1E, at best. Someone who is familiar with law might be able to determine if Aviation Medical Assistance Act of 1998 is notable enough for an article, in which case this could be a nice starting point. Regardless, this article is spam, and should be deleted. Grayfell (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, reads more like a CV than an encyclopædia article. I'm sure Knight is a nice fellow and good at his job, but that doesn't mean he's notable.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:53, 26 February 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.