Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tormondsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

John Tormondsen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:BIO - No substantial coverage in secondary sources. Neil N  talk to me 21:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The fullest coverage he's received is as the defendant in a recent suit filed by Citibank, and that's WP:NOTNEWS. Also note that the article's creator is adding this subject to multiple article lists . 2602:302:D88:CFA9:BC9E:B1CF:D269:DFFB (talk) 21:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree.  The sources offered, and all I could find in my own searches, are just simple news coverage of WP:ONEEVENT.   None of it is really about the subject, it's just reporting that he had a particular job, he left and now he's being sued.  I don't think that's just not enough to satisfy WP:GNG as substantial coverage.  Msnicki (talk) 23:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Except for this short piece, the coverage has been too thin to establish notability.  Magnolia677 (talk) 05:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.