Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tyler Lambert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

John Tyler Lambert

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are very few reliable sources for creating biography and the name of page creator seems possible auto-biography. Marvellous Spider -Man 08:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. While the organization may be notable, its student co-founder is not independently notable. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with above that that sources might be there for the organization, but not a biography. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 12:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vice-presidents and/or presidents of organizations don't get automatic inclusion rights on Wikipedia just because they exist, but nothing written or sourced here suggests that this one is more notable than the norm. An article about the organization might certainly be possible, but even if one is created notability is WP:NOTINHERITED, so the organization having an article still wouldn't exempt its individual executive members from still having to pass an actual notability standard on their own steam. Bearcat (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable enough. Not all company vice-presidents should be included in Wikipedia except if notable. Ilyushka88 &#124; Talk! Contribs 00:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete He is not at this time notable. He may parlay his current political involvement into actions at a level that would make him notable, but he has not done so yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:52, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.