Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Whelan (media executive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 11:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

John Whelan (media executive)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Resume of a non-notable businessperson. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Snotty Wong  prattle 17:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC) The above article is about chief executive of Summit Business Media. Please consider the following articles about not notable magazines from Summit Business Media which all are created by the same user, User talk:Kleinjj. I seriously doubt (and pretty sure) this account is used only for promo. Soewinhan (talk) 19:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, just a promotional article for Mr. Whelan.  Sumsum2010 · T · C  19:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant promo article written by his company's PR person (who has also been notified of COI and has chosen to ignore that warning). He isn't notable for anything really and running a notable business doesn't make you notable.-- Terrillja talk  19:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent coverage. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:29, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. CPerked (talk) 04:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Promo article. All references link to his own website. Soewinhan (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Similar Advertisements
 * Research (magazine)
 * Investment Advisor (magazine)
 * Credit Union Times
 * InsideCounsel
 * Futures (magazine)
 * Treasury & Risk
 * Summit Business Media itself, which has only a few staffs and not notable for any criteria.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.