Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Xintavelonis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 11:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

John Xintavelonis

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

unreferenced stub. fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. no significant third party coverage LibStar (talk) 07:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment transcluded at Articles for Deletion at this timestamp, was incorrectly listed previously. --Taelus (talk) 12:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant third party coverage, well maybe a small amount at a local Tasmania level. Does not meet WP:ENT, really scraping it for significant roles in multiple notable productions. For example yes the lion king is notable but here he is in the Melbourne version of the Lion King (which may not be independently notable) where he operated and I assume spoke for the puppet Pumbaa. This appears to be the biggest role of his career to date. Polargeo (talk) 14:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and improve article. Appears to have a notability for stagework in Australia.,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, just. He was the 10th most newsworthy Tasmanian in 2008: 1, not that that's saying much in and of itself, but it does give insight into the significance of the coverage he has received. His multiple significant roles in notable stage shows, such as the Lion King and Billy Elliott would marginally get him across WP:ENT. --Mkativerata (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.