Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John de Pont


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 00:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

John de Pont

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Award is not major. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. One of a glut of of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:50, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as failing to have in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, as per the WP:GNG. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * speedy Keep It was perhaps not noticed that he is a member of the Royal Scoeity of New Zealand. By our usual standards, that is unquestionable notability  DGG ( talk ) 02:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * You may be confusing member with fellow. Membership is a question of paying a fee (and maybe an ethics signature). Stuartyeates (talk) 04:21, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeed. "You don’t need to be working (or have worked) in science, technology or humanities to become a Member – anyone can become a Member" - WP:SCHOLAR refers to "elected" membership or fellowship. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:21, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, sourcing is limited to primary sources (i.e., his works) and Who's Who. Fails WP:GNG. -- Kinu  t/c 17:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not enough notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.