Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John tedeschi

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete copyvio -- Joolz 17:27, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

John tedeschi
Vanity page that looks like a cut & paste (hence a copyvio) from www.johntedeschi.net/biography/index.html Eddie.willers 01:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Copyvio this is. Tagged it and bagged it I have. To WP:CP take such things in future the nominator should. -Splash 02:26, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio. However, Tedeschi would appear to qualify under WP:Bio for a legitimate article please see his website bio. Capitalistroadster 07:09, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete every copyvio! UniReb 11:27, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Copyvio. Amren (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, edge of the bounds of notability, however... deleting an article because it is a copyright violation is a bad idea, delete the content, not the article. gren グレン 19:36, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * That would leave us with a blank article! You can always write a shiny new article on the /Temp subpage. -Splash 21:43, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Deleting the article is the only way to remove the copyvio from the article's history. Page-blanking does not generally meet the requirements for resolving a copyvio.  Further, if the subject does deserve an article (a point supported above but not proven), that article should be created at the correct title - capitalized last name.  We should allow the copyvio deletion to take precedence over this discussion.  Rossami (talk) 22:32, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dottore So 00:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.