Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John wellington ennis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Keep - nominator withdrew and all other comments for keep. (Disclosure Note: non-admin closure by editor who voted keep.)

John wellington ennis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

All three sources are trivial mentions; no notability established.  American Eagle  ( talk ) 03:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: Name changed to proper case  7   talk   04:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 *  Very Weak Keep per WP:BEFORE. Article doesn't assert notability, but with 6800+ ghits for that exact name  I think we are supposed to try to improve it.     7   talk   04:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of significance or importance much less notability. Drawn Some (talk) 04:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Nominator: Keep – Through the efforts of several users, the article has been totally revamped, establishes notability, and is an acceptable article.  American Eagle  ( talk ) 02:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Changing opinion to Keep as work has been subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews and thus meets WP:CREATIVE. Note that he still fails general requirements, this is a squeak-by. Nice article now, especially the table, good work guys.Drawn Some (talk) 10:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.