Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny A. Pineyro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Johnny A. Pineyro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Run-of-the-mill lawyer with a self-published book. No claim to encyclopedic notability. Madg2011 (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 15:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 15:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails GNG; trivial, non-notable lawyer. Kierzek (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep edited the article to include the point about him being part of the MDAF which according to the source is 1% of the lawyer community. Would pass GNG. I feel its an important point the author missed out on Globe2trotter (talk) 18:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 13:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep after further edits to streamline the article. His notability meets the threshold for a community figure. Ace Class Shadow; My talk.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This was previously linked to Sockpuppet investigations/Gabriela Costa and there are other very strong indicators of undisclosed paid editing in the article. The above keepers all look suspicious to me, so I am relisting until they are CUd.
 * Keep - would pass WP:GNG. Has articles that focus on him. Can try finding more if needed. I didn't include more in the original draft since I thought it was sufficient. A famous lawyer in Florida and other states. Msclguru (talk) 11:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SmartSE (talk) 09:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – At this time. Major claim to notability is that he is a member of the MILLION DOLLAR ADVOCATES FORUM.  However, the only requirement to be part of the organization is a one-time fee of $1200 for application, certification and life membership.  And the Applicants must have acted as Principal Counsel in at least one case which resulted in a trial verdict (and final judgment), award or settlement in the present value amount of One Million Dollars or more. I agree this is an achievement but not a encyclopedic notable achievement. ShoesssS Talk 14:47, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The notability claim might have had some weight if there was some sign (from media attention, etc.) that forum membership itself was notable. --Calton | Talk 02:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Run-of-the-mill lawyer with a self-published book sums it up quite well. No notability here & no sufficient sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.