Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Dakota


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was not a lot of consensus. Four deletes and three keeps, one of which prefers a merge. There's not a lot to merge, so in the end I'm redirecting to Saved by the Bell Minor Characters. Feel free to merge in any other information from the history of this article. Stifle 14:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Johnny Dakota
non-notable, fictional character on one episode of SBTB. Already listed on the minor characters page. Ckessler 18:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)


 * DON'T DELETE ONE OF THE BIGGEST INFLUENTIAL MOVIE STARS OF ALL TIME, JOHNNY DAKOTA!!! OH YEAH, THERE'S NO HOPE WITH DOPE!**


 * Weak keep, as the character does seem to play an important role in the series (addressing problems such as drug use) and the article is reasonably long enough to merit its own article. Either that or merge it into Saved by the Bell Minor Characters. -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 21:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC)


 * It's already listed on the minor characters page. I just don't think that a character who only appears in one episode plays an important role. Ckessler
 * Delete as "Saved By The Bell" fancruft. He's not even a main character. Brian G. Crawford, the so-called &quot;Nancy Grace of AfD&quot; 22:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable enough for own article. Jtmichcock 03:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - The "No Hope for Dope" episode is on of the more "important" (or notable) episodes out there due to its serious message.User:TMC1982
 * Delete Fancruft. MSJapan 00:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per MSJapan. CrazyInSane 02:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep since we have a Category:Saved by the Bell characters and there is no reason to degrade our coverage by getting rid of Johnny Dakota. -- JJay 13:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.