Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny J. Blair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep. - Mailer Diablo 06:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Johnny J. Blair

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible vanity biography. Is this person important enough to warrant a wiki bio? Cxbrx 07:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO and WP:BAND. NetOracle 07:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral, tending to Weak keep. Despite scoring sales rankings in the lower hundreds of thousands, he is an artist signed to an independent label (of which Wampus would pass criterion 4 of WP:MUSIC) who has had more than one independent review which I could find (which I have included as a reference to the article), 1, 2 reviews I found are from sites which score below 1 millionsths per Alexa. I don't know how independent/reliable they are considered to be, but they are not sites which sell discs at all. One review is no more than two lines but I guess that could still count towards passing the letter of WP:MUSIC. Ohconfucius 08:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, article is lacking but passes on the lower end WP:MUSIC Alf photoman 15:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Week Keep - the two exta-wiki and third party sources he provides.martianlostinspace 20:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep --Djsasso 20:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.