Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Jet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Johnny Jet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable blogger, advertisement. Bobak (talk) 20:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * delete Agree on both counts, though I note it's only notability that's grounds for deletion. AdventurousMe (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC) Keep I think this guy is actually notable enough to be on Wikipedia. He appears on radio shows, and in over 3,000 publications. CLCStudent (talk) 18:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * FWIW, there's not a large amount of solidity to this as none of it suggests solidly satisfying the applicable notability or otherwise anything else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  05:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete and Draft and Userfy if needed as searches found expected mentions but nothing else solidly convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  19:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 14:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

My closure of this discussion was queried so I am relisting for further comments. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Firstly to call this person is "blogger" is factually incorrect when in fact he's a very in-demand travel writer, most notably with the Huffington Post.  Is a weekly guest on Leo Laporte's enormously popular show The Tech Guy not to mention hundreds of other television and radio shows and news articles (being a guest on a secondary source is being the subject of and is coverage of a secondary source]].  Looking like an advert is a surmountable problem.  --Oakshade (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete having a regular blog on Huffington Post is not evidence of notability, as none of those posts are helpful in creating an article about Jet. I can see he occasionally gives quotes to news media about travel topics, but I cannot locate any in depth coverage of Jet himself (being quoted is not helpful to establish notability or write a WP page about him). On this basis, I don't think he meets the WP:GNG or WP:BIO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 17:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. All I see are this guy's own site, facebook, twitter, instagram, pintrest, etc.  He knows how to work the social networks, but that doesn't meet our standards.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - You'll find that the published internet searchable sources do not well document this individual's notability (Although he does have some 84k twitter and 36k facebook followers). However, it appears he has had wide-spread exposure on television, and other means; especially under his birth name: John Einar DiScala. Aeonx (talk) 21:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Social media presence does not equate notability. Significant coverage of the topic is required. SST  flyer  07:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.