Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Landmine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Johnny Landmine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article does not provide any sources to establish the subject's notability (either WP:NMILITARY or WP:GNG). A search of the subject has not revealed any significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. The references provided are merely mentions in passing, particularly Ref [3], and do not establish notability. Dan arndt (talk) 02:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems like a notable figure of the SriLankan civil war. I would allow more time for the article to grow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sea Cucumber 17 (talk • contribs) — Sea Cucumber 17 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Indef blocked as a sockpuppet. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment this is not about an individual but about a military product. Given the Sri Lankan civil war concluded a number of years ago and to date there are very few reliable references that even mention this type of land mine it is unlikely that the article will be improved now or into the future.Dan arndt (talk) 03:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Haha, that editor needed to make a couple of edits to attempt to gain some authority. BMK struck their vote righteously. Drmies (talk) 04:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Poorly written, indeed. Probably should be renamed to Joni 95. In addition to sourcing in the article, the following sources also emergeed in a BEFORE -       . Military kit is typically notable if sourced, and this one is. Not averse to merge if there is an appropriate page covering Tamil Tiger mines (Note we have Rangan 99 which is the Joni 99 - and is a copy of a Pakistani mine - but they are quite different technically).Icewhiz (talk) 08:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Icewhiz .This is sourced and further this landmine was used extensively during 26 year Sri Lankan Civil War.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename, as Icewhiz points out, the subject does pass WP:V and passing WP:NPOV and WP:NOR is clearly a matter of cleanup. Smmurphy(Talk) 13:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename, as Icewhiz states. Poorly written as noted, but that is not a reason to delete. Kierzek (talk) 16:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.