Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Lovewisdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Johnny Lovewisdom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:BIO due to lack of reliable sources. Looks like a lot of sources but some seem not reliable or do not cover this person in depth. LibStar (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails every standard: lacking significant coverage, as a creative person, an an author, and as an advocate of fringe ideas. We are not a soapbox for every idea that needs a free web host, and this biography looks like a coatrack for an idea. If it were to be kept, its current state is so poor that we need to delete it and start from scratch. Bearian (talk) 18:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.