Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnson & Bell (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Johnson & Bell
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:NCORP due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources. Let&#39;srun (talk) 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies, Illinois,  and Indiana. Let&#39;srun (talk) 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Firm has been the subject of news stories (mostly in regional and professional news outlets) as a result of its own legal problems. -- Jaireeodell (talk) 15:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, this fails WP:NCORP. I can't see how legal cases, involving a law firm's legal woes (WP:ILLCON), reported only in industry sources (WP:AUD) can make this organisation notable. SailingInABathTub 🛁 13:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: per . voorts (talk/contributions) 03:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.