Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnson Springs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  — fetch ·  comms   18:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Johnson Springs

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does not appear to be notable. Eeekster (talk) 02:07, 6 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment If a source can be provided to back up the statement that it has been a source of 30 million year old fossils, that would count toward notability (I've not heard of it myself). New editor, first contribution, so I don't want to be too tough on a newcomer.  On the other hand, if it can't be shown by verifiable sources, I can't see a reason to keep.  Mandsford 02:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment - I try to leave wiggle room on articles for geographic features, GNIS verifies a "Johnson Spring" in Kentucky but it is nowhere near the location of the spring in question. I'll keep looking for sources but right now I can't even find anything to indicate this springs existence or notability. - Marcusmax  ( speak ) 03:11, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe Johnson Springs does exist as Thelma Stovall Park does exist and there are mentions in unreliable sources such as this and this of the spring's existence. Whereas most articles on streams are notable per WP:5P this particular body of water does not meet WP:RS and is not listed by any form of government federal or local therefore I must say delete. - Marcusmax  ( speak ) 03:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.