Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnson Watch Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Johnson Watch Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable watch company that cannot be sourced (reliably) and only ref is to their website. Their claim to sell luxury watches is credible, however the only coverage I have found is from the watchmakers website(s) that confirms they carry their brand (ie. Omega watches, Tag Huer, etc...) and an article from Indian Vogue that is more of an advertisement. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  01:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of WP:GNG or WP:NCORP Spiderone  19:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete an unremarkable retailer. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.