Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joi Gordon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 22:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Joi Gordon
Whilst her company, Dress for Success Worldwide, certainly sounds noteworthy, this bio seems non-notable. Cnwb 01:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not noteworthy.JohnnyBGood 01:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Dress for Success Worldwide. Royboycrashfan 01:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC) Keep per J.smith. Royboycrashfan 05:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Second Robroycrashfan's proposal. Camillus (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Dress for Success Worldwide. Keep per J.smith. Dr Debug (Talk) 01:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per DrDebug Ruby 01:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Royboycrashfan. Rory 0 96 03:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes I agree Merge but still needs a fair bit of vanity removal. VirtualSteve 05:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - she is the CEO of a worldwide chearity with branches in 10 countries. seems notable to me. Does need a bit of cleanup... seems like lots of it was copy/paste ---J.Smith 06:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep. Newsworthy figure, founder of notable organization. . Article does need cleanup; as J.Smith notes, this seems to be quite close to a presskit bio. Monicasdude 13:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Article by the magazine Hewitt. Epoch Times' article. One more article from Amarillo Globe-News out of Texas.  Do you need more? Ok, here's one from CBS  An exact Google search returns 314 hits. Of the first 20 I looked at, almost all of them were relevent. ---J.Smith 05:32, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per above StarTrek 05:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Smith. Arbustoo 01:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.