Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joint School Chinese Debating Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete all. Keeper   76  16:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Joint School Chinese Debating Society

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I am nominating this group of articles because none of these student organizations are notable. The articles contain either no references or only a primary source (that is, a link to the webpage for the society or team). Hong Kong Joint School Electronics and Computer Society recently failed an AfD, and this article is in the same set.


 * Mikeblas (talk) 03:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Mikeblas (talk) 03:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Mikeblas (talk) 03:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Mikeblas (talk) 03:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Mikeblas (talk) 03:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Mikeblas (talk) 03:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all Student clubs, no claims of notability. Articles like these are usually speedied without controversy. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge the last group with these articles: Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship of Canada, Universities and Colleges Christian Fellowship, InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, Australian Fellowship of Evangelical Students, Tertiary Students Christian Fellowship, Austrian Student Mission, Kristeligt Forbund for Studerende, Norwegian Christian Student and School Association —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottre (talk • contribs) 20:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Question. Why? What is it that they have in common? -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  JForget  22:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all the Hong Kong ones. Between them all there are only four Google Books hits, which are mere mentions. No Google News or Scholar hits for any of them. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 23:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.